检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张芳[1] 晁欣[1] 史泱[1] 黄露[1] 侯应平 申敏[1] 杨帆[1] 梁巍[1] 孙喜斌[1] 曲春燕[1]
机构地区:[1]中国聋儿康复研究中心听力语言门诊部,北京市100029 [2]山西省聋儿康复教育研究中心,山西太原市030012
出 处:《中国康复理论与实践》2014年第5期401-403,共3页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
基 金:卫生行业科研专项项目(No.201202005);中国聋儿康复研究中心项目(No.201201)
摘 要:目的比较3-5岁听障与健听儿童双字调发音的差异。方法以16种双字调组合设计32个词语,测试120名3-5岁听障儿童和36名健听儿童的发音情况。结果健听儿童双字调发音全部正确。听障儿童在3岁、4岁、5岁3个年龄段发音正确率均低于健听儿童;4岁听障儿童正确率较3岁听障儿童提高(P〈0.05),而5岁与4岁间无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。对4个声调发音进行分析,两组儿童阴平双字调发音无显著性差异(P=0.052),阳平、上声、去声的双字调发音有显著性差异(P〈0.05)。结论 3-5岁听障儿童的双字调发音能力显著落后于同龄健听儿童,特别是包含阳平、上声、去声时。Objective To compare the di-syllabic tone between hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing children. Methods 120hearing-impaired children and 36 normal-hearing children aged 3~5 years were asked to read aloud 32 word with 16 kinds of di-syllabictone. Results All the normal-hearing children read all the words correctly, and the hearing-impaired children faulted in pronouncing as theirpeers. The correct incidence improved in 4-year old hearing-impaired children compared with that of the 3-year old, but it was not signifi-cant different between the 4- and the 5- year old. There was not significant difference of the high and level tone between the hearing-im-paired children and normal-hearing children. However, the rising, falling-rising and falling tones were significantly different between thetwo groups. Conclusion The hearing-impaired children aged 3-5 years delay to speech words with di-syllabic tone, especially for those withrising, falling-rising and falling tones.
分 类 号:R764[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15