“整理国故”:“五四”激进文人的驳难与作为  

On Blaming and Achievement of the May 4th Radical Scholars in the Movement for Sorting out the National Cultural Heritage

作　　者：卢付林[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学文学院,湖南长沙410081

出　　处：《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2014年第3期81-89,共9页Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金项目"外籍汉译与中国现代文学的发生"(09BZW054);湖南省高校创新平台开放基金项目"西书中译与中国现代文学思潮和观念的发生"(11K042);湖南省教育厅项目"西书中译与中国现代文学体式的发生"(10C0993)

摘　　要："五四"激进文人发起的国故整理运动,引发了新旧学者整理国故的热潮,这股热潮引发了新旧学者激烈的论争。然而,取得国故整理成果的恰好又是那些对国故存有芥蒂和异议的"五四"激进文人。本文就上述现象的产生原因、论争内容和最终结果展开了深入探讨。认为:整理国故的学者的思想倾向鱼龙混杂,在新文化人那里,他们整理国故的主张也存在缺陷。总的来说,整理国故运动与五四新文化运动是相辅相成的。在思想与学术、学术与文学、现代与传统等多元因素混杂交织的文化生态环境中进行的整理国故运动,其科学的研究精神和民间的价值趋向对于文学、历史、学术的现代转型乃至史学学科的建设、新文学秩序的建立都具有不可忽视的意义。The radical scholar sponsored and impelled the cultural heritage reorganization movement,and triggered a flood of new and old scholars＇ sorting out national cultural heritage, which sparked intense debate and criticism among scholars. However, it is the radical scholars who have objection to sorting out the national cultural heritage got achievement from the reorganization of national cultural heritage. This paper launches a thorough discussion on the reasons for the phenomenon above, and its condemnation content and the final result as well. Although the ideological tendency of the scholars involving in the sorting out the national cultural heritage are quite different, but they are part of the New Culture Movement of the May 4th Period.

关 键 词：五四新文化运动 激进文人 整理国故 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]