检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:荣耀华[1]
出 处:《中国科技论坛》2014年第6期141-146,共6页Forum on Science and Technology in China
摘 要:本文通过构建不同投入产出滞后模型测算高校办学效率,发现滞后性对效率测算没有显著影响,进而运用DEA方法,从效率和全要素生产率变化二维角度交叉分析了2005—2011年教育部直属72所高校的办学表现。结果表明:不同高校办学效率和全要素生产率差距较大;高效率和中等效率之间存在明显的断层;全要素生产率年均增长超过3%的高校都集中在东部;相比于综合和理工类院校,专业类院校平均效率较低,但平均全要素生产率增长较高。This paper measures running efficiencies of higher educational institutions by constructing different input-output lag models, finds that hysteresis has no significant influence on efficiency measure. From two dimensional perspectives of efficiency and total factor productivity change, this paper analyzes the running performance of 72 higher educational institutions directly under ministry of educa- tion in 2005--2011 by DEA methods. The results indicate that there are large differences in running efficiencies and total factor produc- tivities of higher educational institutions. There is an obvious gap between high level and moderate level efficiencies. The higher educational institutions whose average annual growth rates of total factor productivities exceed 3% are all located in eastern region. Although the average efficiency of specialist colleges is lower than those of comprehensive and technological ones, the average annual growth rate of total factor productivities of specialist colleges is higher.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3