细菌性阴道病三种检验方法的比较分析  

The comparative analysis of 3 kinds of test method for bacterial vaginosis

作　　者：郭婧澜[1] 杨明学[1] 

机构地区：[1]泸州医学院附属医院检验科,四川泸州646000

出　　处：《吉林医学》2014年第14期3058-3059,共2页Jilin Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的:比较三种实验室检测方法对细菌性阴道病(BV)的临床诊断意义。方法:采用Amsel法、多胺法(目测法)和化学法(仪器法)检测细菌性阴道病,观察并比较测定结果。结果:4 913例样本采用金标准Amsel法测定结果阳性率为21.13%,BV多胺法(目测法)结果判定阳性率为61.2%,与Amsel法、化学法(仪器法)比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);BV化学法(仪器法)结果判定阳性率为19.36%,与Amsel法比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:BV化学法(仪器法)检测对细菌性阴道病的检测具有准确率高、快速、便于操作的优点。Objective Comparison of 3 methods for laboratory detection of bacterial vaginosis（ BV） and the clinical significance. Methods using Amsel？ method,the method of amines（ visual method） and chemical method（ instrument） detection of bacterial vaginosis,observe and compare the results of determination. Results the results of 4 913 cases of samples by using gold standard Amsel method,the positive rate was 21. 13%; BV method of amines（ visual） the positive rate was 61. 2%（ P〈0. 05）,with a significant difference between the Amsel method,and the chemical method（ instrument） has significant differences（ P〈0. 05）; BV chemical method（ instrument） results to determine the positive rate was 19. 36%（ P〉0. 05）,had no significant difference with the Amsel method. Conclusion BV chemical method（ instrument） detection of bacterial vaginosis has high accuracy,fast,easy to operate

关 键 词：细菌性阴道病 检测方法 比较 

分 类 号：R711.31[医药卫生—妇产科学]