检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王永霞[1]
机构地区:[1]山东大学法学院博士后流动站,山东济南250100
出 处:《山东工会论坛》2014年第2期95-98,共4页Shandong Trade Unions' Tribune
摘 要:法学上的价值判断是指评价或判断立法规则设计或司法判决是否符合一定的价值准则的活动。侵权法的价值判断存在伦理主义和工具主义两种基本进路,前者将法律与道德密切联系在一起,后者视法律为实现特定社会目标的工具,二者各有短长,因此妥当的选择是采取一种混合主义的价值判断进路。我国《侵权责任法》以实现救济受害人之功能为主旨,采纳的是工具主义进路,这一忽视法律的道德维度的立场应予以修正。the value judgment on the law refers to an activity which evaluates or judges whether a legislative rule design or judicial decision is in line with some value criteria. For the value judgment on tort law, there are two basic approaches, ethics and instrumentalism;the former is in close contact with the law and morality, and the latter depends on the law as a tool to achieve specific social objectives, both having short length, so the proper choice is to take a value judgment approach of mixed doctrine. China’s“Tort Liability Act”takes the realization of the function to relieve vic-tims as the theme, adopting the instrumental approach, and we should amend this moral dimensional position which ignores the law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3