检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏理[1] 蒙晓[1] 刘亮辉[1] 于力[1] 陈爱欢[1]
出 处:《中国药房》2014年第22期2094-2096,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:制订并实施药学服务计划,探究其在儿童哮喘治疗过程中对肺功能情况和哮喘控制的影响,为药学服务计划进一步推广提供理论依据。方法:对2012年在我院儿科门诊确诊为支气管哮喘的儿童120例,按哮喘严重程度分为轻、中、重度,同等严重程度的患者随机分为试验组和对照组。试验组在常规治疗外给予药学服务干预,内容包括建立药历、患者教育、门诊咨询、生活指导、心理疏导和电话定期随访6个方面;对照组只接受常规治疗。6个月后采用独立样本t检验,对试验组和对照组患儿的肺功能指标[第1秒用力呼气容积占预计值百分比(FEV1%)和最大呼气流量占预计值百分比(PEF%)]、儿童哮喘控制测试(C-ACT)评分进行统计分析。结果:轻度患者中,与对照组相比,试验组FEV1%、PEF%和C-ACT评分均显著提高(t=2.07、2.34、2.52,P<0.05);中度患者中,与对照组相比,试验组FEV1%、PEF%和C-ACT评分均显著提高(t=2.34、2.83、2.99,P<0.05);重度患者中,与对照组相比,试验组FEV1%、PEF%和C-ACT评分均显著提高(t=2.41、2.07、2.38,P<0.05)。结论:药学服务干预儿童哮喘治疗,可有效改善患儿肺功能情况和哮喘控制水平。OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement pharmaceutical care plan, and to explore the influence of pharmaceutical care on pulmonary function and asthma control in children in order to provide theoretic evidence for further development of pharmaceutical care plan. METHODS: A total of 120 children who were diagnosed as bronchial asthma in our hospital during Jan. to Dec. in 2012 were divided into mild, moderate and severe groups, then they were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group received not only routine treatment but also pharmaceutical care intervention, including the establishment of drug record, patient education, outpatient counseling, life guidance, psychological counseling and telephone follow-up for patients. The control group only received routine treatment. After six months, t-test of independent samples was conducted; the re- sults of pulmonary function index (FEVI% and PEF% ) and children asthma control test (C-ACT) were analyzed statistically. RE- SULTS: In mild asthma patients, FEVI%, PEF% and C-ACT score of experimental group were improved significantly, compared with control group (t=2.07, 2.34, 2.52,P〈0.05); in moderate asthma patients, those of experimental group were improved significantly, compared with control group (t=2.34, 2.83, 2.99,P〈0.05); in severe asthma patients, those of experimental group were improved significantly, compared with control group (t=2.41, 2.07, 2.38,P〈0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmaceutical care intervention can improve pulmonary function and asthma control in children with bronchial asthma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3