“苏瓌有子 李峤无儿”小考  

A Textual Research on“Su Gui has a son,while Li Qiao doesn't”

作　　者：姜剑云[1] 吴萱[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北大学文学院,河北保定071002

出　　处：《河北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第3期52-55,共4页Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)

摘　　要：李峤与苏瓌为武后、中宗朝重臣,"苏瓌有子,李峤无儿"之说,见于各种杂史笔记,有三种不同说法:中宗召二子问"所通书",苏颋之应答颇令中宗满意;苏颋为其父苏瓌守制,坚不起复;同在朝为相,李峤子不及瓌子颋有才能。根据两《唐书》、李峤长子李畅《墓志》等史料,对此三说逐一详加考证后可知,同在武后中宗朝官居要职,峤子不及瓌子颋有才能之说,当为三说之中最为合理的解释。Li Qiao and Su Gui are important minerals of Wuhou Zhongzong Danasty. The saying ＂Su Gui has a son, while Li Qiao doesn＇t＂ can be seen in various historical records and notes. There are three kinds of explanation about this up to now. Zhongzong summoned his two kids and asked ＂what books have you read＂. The reply of Su Ting satisfied Zhongzong. Su Ting observed mourning for his father and refused to be an official. Although they both were chancellors, the son of Li Qiao was less capable than the son of Li Gui. A lot of researches to the three kinds of saying are done one by one with the help of ＂Tang Shu＂ and ＂Mu Zhi＂ written by Li Chang, the eldest son of Li Gui. The most reasonable explanation of the three is the son of Li Qiao less capable than the son of Su Ting.

关 键 词：苏瓌有子 李峤无儿 考释 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]