检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学第一附属医院普通外科,江苏省210029
出 处:《江苏医药》2014年第9期1064-1066,共3页Jiangsu Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨全程大隐静脉抽剥术(TSGS)治疗下肢静脉性溃疡中期疗效。方法回顾性分析下肢静脉性溃疡愈合期患者66例(69条肢体),A组30例行TSGS,B组36例行腔镜下穿通静脉离断术(SEPS)。分别于术后2周、3个月门诊随访,6、12个月及每年电话随访。比较两组患者住院时间、住院费用及术后4年累积溃疡复发率。结果 66例患者术后平均随访时间为37个月。A和B组溃疡复发时间分别为(23.00±1.80)个月和(28.00±5.96)个月(P>0.05)。两组累积溃疡复发率比较无统计学差异。A组住院时间短于B组(P>0.05),住院费用明显低于B组(P<0.01)。结论下肢静脉性溃疡愈合期患者手术可以优先选择TSGS。Objective To investigate the mid-term outcomes of total stripping of great saphenous vein(TSGS) in treating venous ulceration of lower extremity(VULE). Methods A total of 66 VULE patients(69 legs)was treated with TSC-S(group A, 30 cases) and subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery(SEPS)(group B, 36 cases). The patients were followed-up in the 2^nd week and 3^rd, 6^th and 12^th month after surgery. Four-year cumulative ulcer recurrence rate, hospital stay and hospital expenses were compared between two groups. Results Average follow-up time of 66 VULE patients was 37 months. The times of ulcer recurrence in two groups were similar[(23.00±1. 80) months vs. (28. 00±5.96) months](P〉0. 05). There was no significant difference in cumulative ulcer recurrence rate between two groups(P〉0. 05). Hospital expense was lower in group A than that in group B (P〈0. 01). Conclusion TSGS may be taken as the first choice for VULE patients during healing phase.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.185.140