图书馆学界自身存在问题分析--基于《新华文摘》的视角  

Analysis on Problems of the Library Academic Circle——Based on the Perspective of Xinhua Digest

作　　者：张瑜[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]信阳师范学院传媒学院 [2]信阳师范学院文献信息研究所,河南信阳464000

出　　处：《图书馆建设》2014年第5期11-16,共6页Library Development

摘　　要：图书馆学的学科属性和发展规律决定图书馆学必须"走出去",并且必须接受"学术关注度"这一指标的考察。除了《新华文摘》,公信力强的社会科学期刊、媒体、学术网站等较少关注图书馆学的研究成果,因此,《新华文摘》可作为"图书馆学学术关注度"考察的一个样本。2010年以来,《新华文摘》对图书馆学专业期刊的关注度较低,但刊发其他专业人士研究图书馆事业的文章较多。这种状况凸显了图书馆学界自身在"本土化研究工作"与"图书馆学资源配置"这两个方面存在问题。The subject attribute and the development law of the library science make the decision that the library science must ＂go out＂, and must accept the inspection of ＂the academic attention degree＂ index. Besides Xinhua Digest, journals, medium and academic websites of the social science that have strong public trust pay less attention to research resuits of the library science, thus, Xinhua Digest could be taken as an inspection sample of ＂the academic attention degree of the library science＂. Since 2010, Xinhua Digesthas paid less attention to professional journals the library science, but it has published more articles about the librarianship written by other professional reseachers. This condition highlights that the library academic circle itself has problems on two aspects of ＂the localization research work＂ and ＂the resource allocation of the library science＂.

关 键 词：公信力 话语权 学术关注度 《新华文摘》 图书馆学思想 

分 类 号：G250[文化科学—图书馆学]