检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏省中医院,南京210029 [2]南京中医药大学,南京210046
出 处:《医学与社会》2014年第6期84-86,共3页Medicine and Society
摘 要:公平责任原则作为民法上的一种责任分配原则,在司法实践中被广泛运用。目前,在医疗损害赔偿案件中,法院在医疗机构没有过错的前提下为了平息医患矛盾、解决医患纠纷往往在裁判时会援引这一条款,但在部分案件中公平责任原则的适用也引起了一些争议,如不能够真正体现公平、不能准确把握适用的前提等问题。本文试图从几个案例的评析入手,简要地论述公平责任原则在医疗损害赔偿案件中的适用前提和条件,为医疗损害赔偿案件的审理提供有益的帮助。Fair liability principle as a responsibility assignment principle, on the civil law is widely used in the judicial practice. At present, in the medical damage compensation case, the court on the premise of no fault of medical institutions in order to quell the doctor - patient contradiction, solve medical disputes often when the referee was quoted as saying in this clause, but in some cases the application of the fair responsibility principle also caused some controversy, such as can not embody fairness, abuse problems exist in judicial practice. This article attempts from the evaluation of typical cases together, briefly discusses the fair liability principle in the medical damage compensation applicable premise and condition, in the case of medical damage compensation case provide beneficial help.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28