归入与裂变:中国民事主体制度法律移植的路径转向  

Absorption and Disintegration——the Turn of Legal Transplant under the Chinese Civil Subject System

作　　者：王春梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2014年第3期80-87,共8页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：教育部规划基金项目"中国民事主体制度的苏联移植与当代抉择"(项目编号:13YJA820047);中国博士后科学基金资助项目"苏联法对中国民事主体制度之影响"(项目编号:2011M500563);东北农业大学博士启动基金项目"知识产权视域下的农产品质量安全保障研究"(项目编号:2012RCB59)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：纵观整个中华法制的发展历程,除中华法系时期曾经对他国法律发生过影响之外,移植他国法律应该是中国法律制度创建与发展的主要路径与模式。但在20世纪50年代之前,尤其是民国时期的民事主体制度基本上仍然以西方大陆法传统为依归,在结构与内容上都呈现出对大陆法系传统民法的归入。而20世纪50年代之后,苏联法的全面引入不仅使中国民事主体制度发生了路径转向,而且与民法的大陆法传统发生了裂变。围绕民事主体表达、所有制话语、法人分类、国家特殊主体定位及其机关全面法人地位等内容进行的分析具体展现了中国民事主体制度对大陆法传统的归入及其裂变,为我国民事主体制度的当代发展提供方向指引与历史启示。During the evolution of Chinese legal system, transplanting foreign laws should be a main approach and mode of establishing and developing Chinese legal system except that our legal system had an influence on foreign laws during the period of Chinese Legal System. However, prior to 1950s, especially, during the Repub- lican Period, the civil subject system, whose structure and content absorbed traditional civil law of civil law sys- tem, was essentially based on western civil law system. After 1950s, the entire introduction of Soviet law trans- formed the direction of Chinese civil subject system and separated it from traditional civil law system of civil law. The analysis focuses on such issues as expressions of civil subjects, discourse of ownership system, classifi- cation of legal persons, special state subject positioning, entire legal person status of organs, showing Chinese civil subject system absorbs and disintegrates the tradition of civil law, as well as providing a direction and his- torical teaching for the current development of our civil subject system.

关 键 词：民事主体 法律移植 传统民法 苏联法 

分 类 号：D923.1[政治法律—民商法学]