检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙朝军[1] 孙哲[1] 李红[1] 胡志富[1] 何宁[1]
出 处:《大理学院学报(综合版)》2014年第4期32-35,共4页Journal of Dali University
摘 要:目的:比较多种模式联合镇痛与单纯术后镇痛在膝关节置换术中的镇痛效果。方法:选取2009年1月至2013年8月入院拟行人工全膝关节置换术的患者共80例,随机分为多种模式联合镇痛组(A组)及单纯术后镇痛组(B组)。分别记录两组患者术后各时间段静息痛的疼痛评分、膝关节活动度进行统计学分析。结果:A组与B组患者术后72 h内各时间段疼痛评分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后72 h内两组患者膝关节活动度,差异有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:多种模式联合镇痛应用于膝关节置换术围手术期镇痛及促进患者术后早期膝关节主动活动是有效、安全的。具有使用安全、副作用少、易于推广的特点。Objective:To compare the effect of multiple modes combined analgesia and pure postoperative analgesia in artificial knee joint replacement. Methods:A retrospective review of 80 patients with Artificial knee joint replacement who were hospitalized from January 2009 to August 2013.They were randomly assigned to two experimental groups(n =40 per group),Multiple mode combined analgesia combined analgesia group(Group A)and pure postoperative analgesia group(Group B). The effect of analgesia was evaluated by pain score at different time points within 72 hours after surgery and the knee joint activity. Results:The pain score of group B were higher than group A at any time point obviously(P〈0.05),while the knee joint activity of group A were higher than group B(P〈0.05).Conclusion:Multiple mode combined analgesia in the application of the artificial knee joint replacement could reduce the pain of patients and could improve the knee joint early functional exercise of patients. It is safe and effective to use multiple mode combined analgesia in the application of the artificial knee joint replacement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.17.22