检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]宁夏大学西北退化生态系统恢复与重建教育部重点实验室,银川750021
出 处:《中国农村水利水电》2014年第5期1-6,共6页China Rural Water and Hydropower
基 金:"973"课题(2012CB723206);国家自然科学基金项目(41061003)资助
摘 要:利用荒漠草原人工草地豆科与禾本科牧草地上和地下生物量及根长数据,分析并建立生物量分配比例模型.结果表明:两种牧草地上—地下生物量分配模型明显不同,豆科牧草单株生物量明显高于禾本科牧草,地上—地下生物量具有明显的线性关系,拟合参数R2优于禾本科牧草,符合等速生长模型,而禾本科牧草地上—地下生物量呈幂数异速生长关系,异速生长模型的相关系数均在0.368 0以上,与WBE预测模型3/4次幂函数出现偏差;豆科牧草根冠比(R/S)为0.75,接近于中国草地R/S均值0.78,禾本科牧草R/S(1.73)明显高于中国草地R/S均值,表明豆科牧草倾向于将更多的生物量分配到地上,禾本科牧草将更多的生物量分配到地下;不同大小个体的两种牧草R/S均存在明显的可塑性,表现出种内和种间差异,均未出现最优分配理论调节地上—地下生物量分配模式;豆科牧草随个体的增大R/S逐渐变小,禾本科牧草随个体的增大R/S逐渐变大;利用牧草根长拟合其生物量模型,最优预测模型为三次曲线,相关系数在0.511 2~0.906 0.The allocation of above- and below-ground biomass allocation models are analyzed and established by using legume and grass forages aboveground, underground biomass and root length data of artificial grassland in desert steppe. The results show that the above- and below-ground biomass allocation of two forages are obviously different. Legume forages biomass are significantly higher than grass forages, fitting parameters R2 is better than that of grass forages which means the allocation patterns between a- bove- and belowground biomass are similar at both levels and indicate an isometric allocation relationship between above- and below- ground biomass. However, the relationship between the root and the shoot of grass forages characterized by the allometry model, their correlation coefficients are larger than 0. 3680 with a bias against the predicted modes of WBE. Legume forages allocate more biomass into roots with root / shoot (R/S) ratio of 0. 75 which is close to the average of R/S ratio of China(0. 78). On the contrary, grass forages allocate more biomass into shoots with R/S ratio of 1.73 which is significantly higher than 0. 78. Two different sizes of individual forages R/S ratio are obvious plasticity, show the intraspeeific and interspecific differences, and R/S ratio of these legume and grass forages accord with the results predicted with the optimal theory and model. The R/S ratio of legume forages became smaller with the increase in individuals, and the trends are opposite in grass forages. The biomass as well as its components are more relevant to root length, and the cubic curve is the optimal predictive model with correlation coefficient between 0. 511 2 and 0. 906 0.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222