明李龄《宫詹遗稿》误收的两篇白鹿洞书院文稿  

Two Articles Concerning Bai Lu-dong Academy were wrongly Collected in the Gongzanyigao of Ming Dynasty

作　　者：张劲松[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学历史文化学院,湖北武汉430079 [2]南昌师范学院书院研究所,江西南昌330029

出　　处：《韩山师范学院学报》2014年第2期5-9,共5页Journal of Hanshan Normal University

基　　金：江西省社会科学规划课题(项目编号:13JY14);江西省教育科学规划课题(项目编号:2013YB147)

摘　　要：明代天顺、成化年间,江西提学佥事李龄曾重建白鹿洞书院,在书院发展史上有重要影响。其《宫詹遗稿》有五篇关于白鹿洞书院的文稿,但其中《重修贯道桥记》和《白鹿洞新置赡学田记》并非李龄所作,属于误人。《重修贯道桥记》的作者应为天顺年间南康知府钱塘人陈敏政,《白鹿洞新置赡学田记》似为《宫詹遗稿》的编者自撰。Li-ling, an educational superintendent of Jiangxi Province in the periods of Tian-shun and Cheng-hua in Ming Dynasty, played an important role in the history of the Bai Lu-dong Academy .His works Gongzanyigao includes five articles concerning Bai Lu-dong Academy, but The Record on Rebuilding Gandao Bridge （重修贯道桥记） and The Record on newly Purchase Land for Learning in Bai Lu-dong Academy （白鹿洞新置赡学田记） were not written by Li.The real authors were respectively Chen Min-zheng and the edi-tor of Gongzanyigao.

关 键 词：明代 李龄 《宫詹遗稿》 白鹿洞书院 

分 类 号：G649.299[文化科学—高等教育学]