检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晓琴[1]
机构地区:[1]同济大学建筑设计研究院(集团)有限公司,上海200092
出 处:《结构工程师》2014年第2期79-83,共5页Structural Engineers
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(90915011;51278376)
摘 要:传统的桥梁抗震设计方法分为延性抗震设计和减隔震设计两类。对于高墩桥梁来说,通常采用延性抗震方法作为首选方案,而震后易修复的减隔震方案对高墩桥梁较难应用。提出一种新型高墩中层减隔震体系,即将一般高墩桥梁的桥墩在中部隔断,在隔断处设置减隔震支座,以某高架桥为背景,对比了延性设计、传统减隔震设计与中层减隔震设计的纵桥向抗震效果。研究表明,从"力"与"位移"两方面来看,相较于延性设计和传统减隔震设计,高墩桥梁采用中层减隔震设计的抗震效果更为明显,可以提高高墩桥梁采用减隔震技术的适应性。Ductility seismic design and seismic isolation design are two major seismic design methods for bridges. In the seismic design of high pier bridges, the ductility seismic design is a preferred method, since the seismic isolation design is difficult to apply although it is easy to repair after earthquakes. In this paper, a new seismic design method called the middle-seismic-isolation design is presented, in which seismic isolation bearings are deployed in the middle of high piers. Seismic performances of bridges by using the ductility seis- mic design, the seismic isolation design, and the middle-seismic-isolation design are compared with a practical viaduct project. The results indicate that the seismic performance of the bridge with the middle-seismic-isola- tion design, in terms of force and displacement, is significantly better. By this approach, the seismic isolation design could be applied to a broader range of bridges with high piers.
分 类 号:U442.55[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42