对OLCC与CUCC题名著录差异的分析与评价  

Analysis and Evaluation on the Differences of Title Description between OLCC and CUCC

作　　者：邓福泉[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁石油化工大学图书馆

出　　处：《国家图书馆学刊》2014年第3期75-79,共5页Journal of The National Library of China

摘　　要：0LCC与CUCC是目前我国最大的两家联机编目机构,二者对ISBD规则和MARC格式功能的理解不尽相同,导致他们在题名著录方面存在明显差异。为了使编目结果能更好地体现出ISBD规则和MARC格式的要求,建议两家编目机构联手就相关差异进行深入探讨,取长补短,共同提高我国书目数据的编制质量。参考文献6。OLCC and CUCC are currently China＇s two largest online cataloging agencies, and their understand- ings of ISBD rule and MARC format function are not the same, resulting in obvious differences in their title de- scription. In order to make cataloging results better reflect the requirements of ISBD rule and MARC format, it is recommended that the two cataloging agencies jointly make an in-depth analysis of related differences and learn from each other to improve the quality of the compilation of the bibliographic data in China. 6 refs.

关 键 词：OLCC CUCC 题名著录 MARC格式 比较研究 

分 类 号：G254.3[文化科学—图书馆学]