检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王娟[1] 谢飞[1] 陈潭琇 孙霞霞[1] 李琼书[1] 台桂香[1]
机构地区:[1]吉林大学基础医学院免疫学教研室,吉林长春130021
出 处:《吉林大学学报(医学版)》2014年第3期539-542,共4页Journal of Jilin University:Medicine Edition
基 金:科技部"十二五"重大新药创制专项资助课题(2011ZX09102001-36)
摘 要:目的:评价超滤技术去除纯化后重组MUC1-MBP融合蛋白(MUC1-MBP)溶液中内毒素的效果,阐明超滤技术对去除内毒素的作用。方法:选取表达MUC1-MBP大肠杆菌基因工程菌,分别通过CM Sepharose FF离子交换层析(CM)(CM组)、CM联合Phenyl Sepharose 6FF疏水层析(C6)(CM+C6组)、CM加超滤(CM+超滤组)以及CM联合C6加超滤(CM+C6组+超滤)进行纯化,并去除内毒素;采用SDS-PAGE分析蛋白纯度;鲎试剂显色基质法检测内毒素表达水平。结果:SDS-PAGE分析,在预期相对分子质量62 000处呈现单一条带,Quantity One分析纯度>96%;CM组与CM+C6组内毒素表达水平均较高,但2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与CM组比较,CM+超滤组内毒素表达水平明显降低(P<0.01);与CM+C6组比较,CM+C6超滤组内毒素表达水平明显降低(P<0.01);CM+超滤组与CM+C6+超滤组内毒素表达水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:CM或CM联合C6均不能有效去除内毒素,其中C6对去除内毒素几乎无作用;CM加超滤可有效去除内毒素,超滤技术在去除内毒素中发挥重要作用。Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrafiltration technology in endotoxin removal from purified recombinant MUC1-MBP fusion protein (MUC1-MBP)and to demonstrate the effect of ultrafiltration on endotoxin removal.Methods CM Sepharose FF weak cation exchange (CM)(CM group), CM combined with Phenyl Sepharose 6 FF exchange (C6)(CM+C6 group),CM combined with ultrafiltration (CM+ultrafiltration group), and CM combined with C6 and ultrafiltration (CM+C6+ultrafiltration group)were used to purify the MUC1-MBP from E.coli. and remove endotoxin;the expression level of endotoxin was detected by Chromogenic End-point Tachypleus Amebocyte Lysate.Results There was a single band at the expected molecular weight of 62 000 by SDS-PAGE analysis.and the purity〉96% by Quantity One analysis.The endotoxin levels in CM group and CM +C6 group were quite high and there was no significant difference between two groups (P〉0.05 );the endotoxin level in CM+ultrafiltration group was significantly lower than that in CM group, and there was significant difference (P〈0.01);the endotoxin level in CM+C6+ultrafiltration group was significantly decreased compared with CM+C6 group (P〈0.01);there was no significant differences of endotoxin level between CM+ultrafiltration group and CM +C6+ultrafiltration group (P〉0.05 ). Conclusion The effects of CM or CM combined with C6 on endotoxin removal are quite poor, especially C6;CM combined with ultrafiltration are quite effective on endotoxin removal,and ultrafiltration plays an important role in endotoxin removal.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170