检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《北京社会科学》2014年第5期65-72,共8页Social Sciences of Beijing
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目(10ASH007);教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(11YJC840010)
摘 要:本文利用2006年CGSS数据从老人的角度出发研究老人的居住模式与养老资源获取之间的关系,同时来验证谢桂华利用同样的数据从子女的角度出发对老年人居住模式与子女赡养行为之间的关系的研究。本文通过logistic回归分析发现,在居住模式和居住距离对于老人从子女那里获得的经济支持和日常照料上的影响基本与谢桂华的研究一致,但是居住模式和居住距离对于老人从子女那里获得的精神慰藉的影响不同。本文中居住模式和居住距离对于老人从子女那里获得的精神慰藉没有显著影响。另外,本文认为女儿在养老的三个方面的作用已经超过儿子,这也与谢桂华的研究有所不同。而在子女数量对于老人养老资源获取的影响上验证了谢桂华的研究,即子女数量对于老人养老资源获取没有显著影响。可见,从老人的角度出发所得出的居住模式与养老资源获取的结论与从子女角度出发的分析结论存在一定差异。In this paper, we use the same data to verify that the living pattern of the elderly and the access of endowment resources. But we do this research from the perspective of the elderly. Based on the logistic regression analysis we found the same conclusion with Xie Guihua of how the living pattern and the living distance affect the elderly getting financial support and the daily care from their children. But we get a different conclusion of how the living pattern and the living distance affect elderly getting spiritual comfort. In this article, the living patterns and living distance have no significant effect on the elderly getting spiritual comfort from their children, tn addition, this paper concludes that the daughter play a more important role in the three aspects of supporting the elderly, which is much different from Xie Guihua's research. And we verified Xie Guihua's research on the influence of the number of children to the elderly getting resources , finding that the number of children has no significant influence on the elderly getting resources. On the whole there is a different conclusion about the relationship between living pattern and the access of endowment resources when we draw from the perspective of the elderly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249