检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李娜[1] 方园[2] 钱洪军[1] 陈铮[1] 郭燕飞[1]
机构地区:[1]河南省漯河医学高等专科学校第一附属医院整形美容科,462000 [2]河南省漯河医学高等专科学校实训教研室
出 处:《中国实用医药》2014年第12期18-20,共3页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:【摘要】目的探讨VSD在降低整形外科感染中的临床效果。方法将本院2011年3月~2013年10月整形外科收治的86例整形患者分为观察组和对照组,每组各43例,对照组给予常规换药处理,观察组给予VSD治疗,比较两组患者的治疗效果、创面修复时间和感染发生率。结果观察组患者的创面愈合良好、无渗液者40例(93.02%),对照组创面愈合良好、无渗液者34例(79.07%),两组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。观察组患者的1周愈合率为48.8%,明显高于对照组的20.9%,两组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。观察组患者的感染发生率为4.65%,对照组为18.60%,两组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论VSD在降低整形外科感染中的临床效果显著。Objective To explore the clinical effect of VSD in reducing plastic surgery infection. Methods 86 patients with cosmetic plastic surgery in our hospital from March 2011 to October 2013, they were divided into observation group and control group, 43 cases in each group, the control group was given conventional treatment process, the observation group was given the VSD treatment, the treatment effect, wound repair time and the incidence of infection in two groups were compared. Results The wound healed well, no solutions in 40 cases (93.02%) of observation group, the wound healed well, no solutions in 34 cases (79.07%) of observation group, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). patients with 1 week the healing rate was 48.8% in observation group, significantly higher than the control group 20.9%, the difference was statistically signihcant (P〈O.05). The infection rate was 4.65% in observation group, the control group was 18.60%, the difference was statistically significant (/9〈0.05). Conclusion The VSD in reducing plastic surgery infection in clinical effect is remarkable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222