司法救济的逻辑起点:征收补偿协议性质之辨正——兼及补偿协议履行纠纷司法救济之阶段性设计  

The Logical Starting Point of the Judicial Relief: the Differentiation of Levy Compensation Agreement's Nature

作　　者：刘启川[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,南京211189

出　　处：《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第2期45-54,共10页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目"行政法上类推适用的原理与方法"(2013SJD820012);江苏省研究生培养创新工程项目"现代城市法治化治理下的交通警察权研究"(CXLX13_069)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：《国有土地上房屋征收与补偿条例》第二十五条对所涉补偿协议纠纷,采取何种诉讼予以救济不置可否,极易导致法院受理案件与民众维护权益时无所适从,因而,应辨明征收补偿协议的性质。从基本法理分析得知,征收补偿协议契合行政契约的内在逻辑,并且,当前"民事契约论"的形成多囿于补偿协议的契约性而径直定性,抑或受制于现有制度框架造成的惯性思维。而把征收补偿协议定位为行政契约,既可以使征收补偿协议得到理性回归,推进行政契约理论在行政活动中获得本真拓展,又可以更好地保护行政相对人的合法权益。The article 25 of Collection of State-owned Land, Housing and Compensation Ordinancedoes not state what action to take to remedy when disputes happen, which fails to enable neither the courtto accept a case nor the public to maintain rights and interests. Therefore, the nature of the compensationagreement should be identified. Compensation agreement is inherent with the logic of administrative con-tract. The formation of the civil contract view is either constrained by the contractual nature of compensa-tion agreement or limited by the inertial thinking caused by the existing institutional framework. Locatingthe compensation agreement as administrative contract not only enables its rational return, but also pro-motes natural development of the administrative contract theory in the administrative activities. Moreover,it is of practical significance for the protection the legitimate rights and interests for the administrativecounterpart.

关 键 词：征收补偿协议 拆迁补偿协议 行政契约 民事契约 司法救济 

分 类 号：D922.181[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]