糯康案件所涉刑事管辖权暨国际刑事司法合作问题研究  

Criminal Justice Jurisdiction and International Criminal Justice Cooperation in the Nawkham Case

作　　者：赵远[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《法学杂志》2014年第6期127-140,共14页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：国际社会所普遍关注的糯康案件所涉的刑事管辖权和国际刑事司法合作问题颇有研究价值。涉案四国都主张对本案有管辖权,而中国对本案行使管辖权合法合理且更有积极意义。在本案的侦破与抓捕过程中,多国间的司法合作举足轻重;根据《中老引渡条约》,糯康应当被老挝引渡至中国受审,且不适用政治犯不引渡及死刑犯不引渡原则;该案成功的国际司法合作实践有效地维护了中国的国家主权,并为中国与东盟间今后开展更广泛的司法合作开辟了道路。The Nawkham case, which has attracted the attention of international community, provides useful materials for study issues such as criminal justice jurisdiction and international judicial cooperation. Whilst all four countries involved claimed their jurisdiction over the case, the author argues that China should exercise its jurisdiction legally and legitimately. International judicial cooperation was of vital importance in the investigation and arrest of the defendant. According to the Treaty between the Lao People＇s Democratic Republic and the People＇s Republic of China on Extradition, Nawkham should be extradited from the Laos to China, without being subject to the principle that political defendants are not extradition to a jurisdiction retaining the death penalty. The successful experience of international judicial cooperation have effectively maintained China＇s sovereignty and paved the way for wider judicial cooperation between China and members states of ASEAN.

关 键 词：糯康 刑事管辖权 国际司法合作 引渡 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]