术前病历质量管理评价  

Preoperative Records Quality Management Evaluation

作　　者：谢娜[1] 彭晔[1] 王艳玲[1] 韩轶超[1] 杨秀芳[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北省衡水市哈励逊国际和平医院质控办,衡水市053000

出　　处：《中国病案》2014年第6期26-28,共3页Chinese Medical Record

摘　　要：目的了解术前手术病历书写存在的主要问题及质量控制的重要作用。方法随机抽取术前手术病历共4024份,应用术前手术病历专项质控表进行质控,比较质控前后缺陷病历数及平均病历缺陷率。结果质控前缺陷病历数746份,占总抽查病历数的40.00%。质控后缺陷病历数208份,占总抽查病历数的9.63%,缺陷病历数对比有统计学意义(P=0.000),术前检查、术前医患沟通、手术安全核查及风险评估、术前医嘱、术前病程的平均病历缺陷率均降低,并有统计学意义(P=0.000)。结论持续加强术前手术病历的质量监控,可以提高术前手术病历书写质量。Objective To understand the main problems existed in preoperative operation records and the important role of quality control. Methods Randomly selecting 4024 preoperative surgical medical records, and using preoperative surgical medical records special quality control table to exam them. To compare the number of defects medical record and average defect rate before and after quality control. Results The number of defect medical ~ecords before quality control is 746, accounting for 40% of the total number of records. The number of defect medical records after quality control is 208, accounting for 9.63% of the total number of records. The comparison has statistical significance （P=0.000）. The average defect rates of preoperative examination, preoperative physician-patient communication, operation safety verification and risk assessment, preoperative medication, preoperative course record have declined with statistical significance （P = 0.000）. Conclusion Continue to strengthen the quality control of preoperative operation records can improve the preoperative operation records quality.

关 键 词：术前手术病历 质量 对比分析 

分 类 号：R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]