检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]十堰市东风公司茅箭医院中医康复科,湖北十堰442000 [2]十堰市计划生育服务站,湖北十堰442000
出 处:《海南医学》2014年第9期1402-1404,共3页Hainan Medical Journal
摘 要:目的观察和比较不同家庭护理方式对脑出血出院患者的康复效果,为开展家庭护理提供理论依据与指导。方法随机抽取80例脑出血患者,将其分为干预组和对照组,干预组在一般出院医嘱基础上给予院外康复指导,采用4个常用神经康复评估的标准量表分别于出院时和出院6个月后对康复效果进行评估。结果出院时两组患者的美国国立卫生院卒中量表评分(NIHSS)、简易精神状态量表评分(MMSE)、Frenchay活动指数和Mount Sinai多模式情绪评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),而出院6个月后两组患者上述4个指标比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论出院后积极的家庭护理和康复治疗有利于脑出血患者功能恢复,应重视家庭护理,提高家庭护理服务质量。Objective To observe and compare the rehabilitation effect of different home care modes in pa-tients with cerebral hemorrhage, and to provide theoretical and guiding basis for home care. Methods Eighty pa-tients with cerebral hemorrhage were selected and divided into two groups: the intervention group and the control group. Patients in intervention group received out-hospital rehabilitation guidance in addition to general discharge in-structions based on the control group. Finally, the rehabilitation effect of the two groups was assessed by 4 standard scales at discharge and 6 months after discharge. Results NIHSS, MMSE, Frenchay movable index and Mount Sinai mood scores in two groups had no significant difference at discharge (P〉0.05), but the 4 scores showed statistically significant difference 6 months after discharge (P〈0.05). Conclusion Active rehabilitation curing and home care are beneficial to the functional recovery of patients with cerebral hemorrhage after discharge, so it is worthy to attach im-portance to home care.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.169.229