农地福利化:实践机制、后果呈现及其优化路径——以沪郊埭村为个案的初步分析  

Farmland as Welfare: Practice Mechanism,Consequence Presentation and its Optimized Path: Analysis Based on Di Village in Shanghai Suburb

作　　者：马流辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东理工大学社会学系,上海200237

出　　处：《南京农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第6期66-73,92,共9页Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：北京郑杭生社会发展基金会学子项目(12ZHFD07);上海市阳光计划项目(122YG04);国家社会科学青年基金项目(12CSH040)

摘　　要：在沪郊的农村,制度化社会保障体系的建立和稳定性非农就业的实现,使农地原初具有的生活保障和就业承载功能逐步剥离,呈现出"去保障化"的趋势。但在现有的农地制度安排下,农户的承包权已经物权化,各级政府的惠农补贴和畸形农地流转市场形成的虚高地租,强化了农地的收益效应。在这一情势下,"去保障化"的农地转而成为满足农民"多多益善"心理的福利,农地福利化倾向凸显。本文以沪郊埭村为个案,对农地福利化的实践机制进行分析,并呈现这一发展趋势的社会经济后果,最后提出破解农地福利化困境的优化路径,以期为下一步的农地制度改革提供参考。In Shanghai suburb,with the establishment of the institutionalized social security system and realizationof stable non-agricultural employment,the living and employment security function has been stripped from thefarmlands,which presents the trend of “De-security”. While in the existing farmland system arrangement,farm-ers＇contract right has been real right. The agricultural subsidies from governments at all levels and the bubbleland rents formed in abnormal land turnover market have strengthened the farmland income effect. In this situa-tion,“De-security”farmlands have become the welfare to cater to farmers＇mentality of “the more the better”,and thus the trend of farmland as welfare has been highlighted. Based on Di Village in Shanghai suburb,the arti-cle analyzed the practice mechanism of farmland as welfare,presents the social and economic consequences of thedeveloping trend,and puts forward the optimized path as a solution to the dilemma of farmland as welfare,so as toprovide reference for the further farmland system reform.

关 键 词：农地福利化 农地流转 农地制度改革 

分 类 号：F301.1[经济管理—产业经济]