检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:瞿伟[1] 谭永红 谷珊珊[1] 郭俊伟[1] 宁洁[1] 何梅[1]
机构地区:[1]第三军医大学西南医院临床心理科,全军心理卫生研究中心,重庆400038 [2]武警重庆总队医院心理咨询门诊,重庆400061
出 处:《第三军医大学学报》2014年第11期1118-1120,共3页Journal of Third Military Medical University
基 金:第三军医大学校管临床课题(2010XLC17)~~
摘 要:目的探讨全病程管理模式对抑郁症患者依从性及疗效的影响。方法采用前瞻性平行对照研究,将2011年1月至2013年3月在西南医院临床心理科门诊就诊的符合DSM-Ⅳ抑郁发作诊断标准100例首发抑郁症患者按随机数字表法分配50例患者接受全病程管理服务(全病程管理组),50例进行门诊常规治疗(对照组),所有患者跟踪随访6个月,对两组患者治疗前基线及治疗后1、3、6个月进行依从性及17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)的评定。结果治疗后第1个月两组患者依从性无显著差异(P>0.05),在治疗后第3、6个月全病程管理组依从性均显著高于对照组(P<0.05,P<0.01);对照组患者治疗后第1、3个月HAMD评分明显低于治疗前,但治疗后第6个月HAMD评分与治疗前比较差异不显著(P>0.05);而全病程管理组HAMD评分在治疗后1、3、6个月均显著低于治疗前(P<0.05),且评分随治疗时间延续呈递减趋势;全病程管理组与对照组在治疗后第1个月HAMD评分比较无显著差异(P>0.05),而在治疗后3、6个月全病程管理组HAMD评分均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论全病程管理模式能提高抑郁症患者的依从性及疗效。Objective To investigate the efficacy and compliance of whole course management for depressed patients. Methods A total of 100 patients who met with the DSM-Ⅳ diagnostic criteria of depressive episodes and freshly diagnosed depression in our clinic from January 2011 to March 2013 were enrolled in this prospective parallel controlled study. The cohort of patients was random divided into 2 groups, with no significant difference in age, sex, educational levels and scores of psychological scales. One group received a full course of management services, and another group received conventional treatment. All the patients were followed up for 6 months. Patient compliance was assessed by Morisky’s compliance scale and the efficiency was evaluated by 17-item Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) before and in 1, 3 and 6 month after treatment. Results There was no significant difference between 2 groups in compliance scale score in the first month after treatment (P〉0.05), but the score was significantly higher in the whole course management group than the control group in 3 and 6 months after treatment (P〈0.05, P〈0.01). The HAMD scale score in the control group was significant lower in 1 and 3 months after than before treatment (P〈0.05), but no such difference was seen in 6 month after treatment (P〉0.05). However, the score of the whole course management group was significantly reduced in 1, 3 and 6 month after treatment than before treatment (P〈0.05), and the values were in a time-dependent manner. No significant difference was seen in the score in 1 month after treatment (P〉0.05), the whole course management group had significantly lower scores than the control group in 3 and 6 months after treatment (P〈0.05).Conclusion Whole course management improves the compliance and efficacy in depressed patients.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] R395.2[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15