检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邱鸿钟[1] 王晓曼[1] 梁瑞琼[1] 金兵[1]
机构地区:[1]广州中医药大学经济与管理学院,广州510006
出 处:《中国药房》2014年第24期2209-2211,共3页China Pharmacy
基 金:广东省医学科研基金指令性课题项目(No.C2013019)
摘 要:目的:为完善我国基本药物遴选方法提供建议。方法:采用文献研究、数学模型等研究方法梳理并评价世界卫生组织、中国及部分国家遴选基本药物的模型和方法,指出当前我国基本药物遴选程序、模型和方法上存在的问题,并提出建议。结果:当前基本药物遴选主要有专家决策法、循证医学评价法、药物经济学评价法等。我国基本药物目录遴选主要存在遴选方法单一、指标不明确等问题。结论:建议重新构建一个五维的评价指标体系,并按证据强度采用五级评分,引入模糊综合评价模型优化基本药物的遴选。OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations for improving the selection methods of essential medicine in China. METHODS: The literature research methods and mathematical models were adopted. The selection models and methods of essential medicine of WHO, China and some other countries was evaluated and sorted; the problems were pointed out about the program, models and methods of essential medicine selection. RESULTS: The commonly used methods of selection including expert deci- sion-making, evidence-based evaluation method, pharmacoeconomic evalution method, etc. Essential medicine selection in China mainly exist some problems, such as selection methods is single, indicators are not unclear, etc. CONCLUSIONS: It is recom- mended to reconstruct a five-dimensional evaluation system, to adopt the five grades according to the strength of evidence, and to optimize the selection of essential medicines by introducing the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] R95[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249