检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:华海音[1] 杨广[1] 刘克玄[1] 陈秉学[1] 黄文起[1] 何广芬[1] 冯霞[1]
机构地区:[1]中山医科大学附属第一医院麻醉科,广州市510080
出 处:《临床麻醉学杂志》2001年第3期127-129,共3页Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
摘 要:目的 研究咪唑安定复合氯胺酮肌注或口服用于小儿基础麻醉的可能性。方法 80例 1~ 8岁、ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级的患儿随机等分成四组 :A组 ,肌注氯胺酮 6mg/kg ;B组 ,肌注氯胺酮 4mg/kg +口服咪唑安定 0 2mg/kg ;C组 ,口服氯胺酮 5mg/kg +咪唑安定 0 5mg/kg ;D组 ,口服咪唑安定0 7mg/kg。观察各组麻醉诱导效果、循环呼吸变化及不良反应。 结果 (1)B组与A组相比 ,起效更快 ,术中不良反应发生率更低 (P <0 0 5 ) ,而麻醉诱导效果无明显差异 (P >0 0 5 ) ;(2 )C组与A组相比 ,小儿更为合作 (P <0 0 1) ,HR增加不明显 (P >0 0 5 ) ,但起效更慢 (P <0 0 5 ) ,镇静程度不如后者 (P <0 0 5 ) ,但 80 %的患儿尚能与父母分离。结论 咪唑安定复合氯胺酮肌注用于小儿麻醉诱导要优于单纯肌注氯胺酮 ,而咪唑安定复合氯胺酮口服仍不失为一种可行的诱导方法。Objective To investigate the possibility of muscular injection or oral administration of midazolam combined with ketamine for the induction in children.Methods 80 children,aged 1 to 8,ASAgrades Ⅰ-Ⅱ,were divided randomly into four groups:group A, ketamine 6mg/kg im,group B,ketamine 4mg/kg +midazolam 0 2mg/kg im, group C,ketamine 5mg/kg +midazolam 0 5mg/kg po,group D,midazolam 0 7mg/kg po. The efficacy of anesthsia induction,hemodynamic and respiratory changes and side effects of the drugs administered were observed.Results (1)Compared to group A,group B experienced faster onset and fewer side effects ( P< 0 05),while the efficacy of induction had no significant difference ( P> 0 05).(2)Compared to group A,children in group C could cooperate better with out obvious heart rate increase ( P> 0 05),but experienced slower onset and worse induction quality ( P< 0 05).80% of patients in group C could separate from their parents.Conclusion Intramuscular injection of midazolam combined with ketamine is a better method than ketamine im alone for basic anesthesia in child.Oral administration of midazolam combined with ketamine is still an alternative method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3