检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长安大学经济与管理学院,陕西西安710064
出 处:《公路交通科技》2014年第6期149-152,共4页Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(13BJY123);2013年中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2013G6233022);陕西省社科界2013年度重大理论与现实问题研究项目(2013Z058)
摘 要:基于产权经济学的权利有效性模型和模糊集与隶属函数的权利有效性模型剖析了《重大节假日免收小型客车通行费实施方案》对公路经营权主体所造成的影响,得出:(1)单从现代企业制度层面看,《方案》的实施有悖于收费公路经营权特许转让协议和现代企业制度。但从收费公路准公共物品特性看,《方案》的实施与收费公路经营企业的社会责任不是相悖的;(2)对于收费公路经营权本身而言,《方案》降低了该权利的有效性,从而削弱了其流动性,有碍于收费公路行业资源的优化配置和社会专业化分工。应考虑并出台相应的补偿条款,在一定程度上抵消《方案》产生的不利影响。Based on the right utility models of property right economics, fuzzy sets and membership function, we examined the influence of The Proposal of Exemption of Passenger Car Tolls for National Holidays on the highway operation right body. It is concluded that ( 1 ) from the perspective of modem enterprise system, the implementation of the Proposal contradicts the agreement of toll road franchise transfer and modem enterprise system, while from the perspective of the quasi-public goods characteristic of the toll road, the implementation of the Proposal does not contradict the social responsibility of the toll road management enterprises ; (2) in terms of toll road operation right itself, the Proposal undermines the effectiveness of operation right and its mobility which will hinder the optimization and specialization of highway industry resource. The corresponding compensation clause should be put forward to weaken the negative influence of the Proposal.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42