动态与静态面部表情加工的比较:来自眼动的证据  

Comparing Dynamic with Static Facial Expressions Processing: Evidence from an Eye Movement Study

作　　者：李文辉[1] 刘丽莎[1] 吕博[1] 李婵[2] 蒋重清[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁师范大学心理学系,中国大连116029 [2]辽宁石油化工大学

出　　处：《中国健康心理学杂志》2014年第5期700-702,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology

摘　　要：目的采用眼动技术,比较动态和静态呈现面部表情即时加工特点。方法选取17名被试进行实验,采用2(呈现方式:动态、静态)×3(面部表情:高兴、中性、生气)的两因素被试内设计。使用ASL504型眼动仪记录被试观看不同面部表情图片(每种条件各10张)的眼动情况,眼动分析指标包括总注视时间、注视百分比、注视点个数和凝视点个数。结果反应时出现了面部表情主效应(F(2,32)=5.27,P=0.011)。事后比较(LSD)显示,中性表情比高兴表情和生气表情反应时更长(P<0.05)。注视点个数出现了呈现方式主效应(F(1,16)=14.34,P=0.002),动态呈现方式的注视点比静态呈现方式更少。凝视点个数出现面部表情主效(F(2,32)=5.14,P=0.012)。事后比较显示,中性面部表情比高兴和生气面部表情的凝视点更多(P<0.05)。结论在同等时间内动态呈现面部表情的加工更有效率,进而证明了面部表情加工中的动态优势。Objective To compare static with dynamic facial expression processing by eye movement technique. Methods A total of 17 college students （ 8 males ） participated in our experiment. A 2 （ presentation pattern ： dynamic and static） × 3 （ facial expression ： angry, neutral, and happy）factorial design was adopted, with presentation pattern and facial expression as within-participant variables. The ASL504 Eye Tracking system was used to assess the facial expression processing. Results Response time result showed a main effect of the facial expression（F（2,32） = 5.27 ,P = 0.011 ）. Fixation points result showed a main effect of presentation pattern（F（1,16） = 14. 34 ,P = 0.002）. Gaze points result showed facial expression main effect（F（2,32） = 5. 14, P = 0. 012）. Conclusion Present study provides support for previous researches, which have claimed dynamic facial expressions of emotion unfolding over time are better recognized than staric images

关 键 词：动态 静态 面部表情 眼动 

分 类 号：B845.2[哲学宗教—心理学]