检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]空军临潼航空医学鉴定训练中心,中国西安710600 [2]甘肃省军区门诊部
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2014年第5期748-749,共2页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的了解飞行人员反应能力的水平,分析不同机种飞行人员能力水平的差异,为选拔飞行员工作提供更为客观的依据。方法采用第四军医大学研制的DXC-6型多项群体心理测评仪,对561名现役飞行人员进行数字搜索测验。结果随着答题的进程,飞行人员的反应时间越来越短;轰炸机组比直升机组、运输机组答题时间短,歼击机组比运输机组答题时间短(F=70.356,P<0.001);在各答题阶段中,运输机组和直升机组答题时间最长,歼击机组次之,轰炸机组最短(F=5.994,P<0.01)。结论在对不同机种飞行人员进行选拔时,能力测试的反应时间可作为客观指标之一。Objective To investigate reaction ability in pilots ,and analyze the difference of reaction ability of pilots served in differ-ent planes,and so as to suggest more objective evidence for selecting pilot .Methods A total of 561 pilots of active army were examined by the Digital Search test ,which were used by DXC-6 psychological measurement instrument .Results According to the course of an-swering,the reaction time was shorter and shorter;Reaction time of bombing plane group was shorter than those in group of helicopter plane and fighter plane,and group of fighter plane was shorter than group of aero transport plane (F=70.356,P〈0.001);The time of the aero transport plane and helicopter plane groups were longer in the four groups ,while shorter time group was fighter plane ,and the shortest group was bombing plane at every parts of answering (F=5.994,P〈0.01).Conclusion The reaction time of ability can be one of the objective evidence for selecting pilot in different planes .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30