检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院临床检验中心,新疆乌鲁木齐830001
出 处:《国际检验医学杂志》2014年第11期1470-1470,1473,共2页International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
摘 要:目的比较3种检测C反应蛋白方法的检测结果。方法收集该院100例就诊患者,分别采用3种不同的C反应蛋白检测方法分析血液中C反应蛋白浓度。结果相关性分析表明,免疫比浊法和免疫层析法检测结果的相关性较高(r=0.992 0)。方差分析发现,采用免疫比浊法检测的C反应蛋白浓度正常者中,个体间C反应蛋白浓度间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而C反应蛋白异常者中,个体间差异不显著(P>0.05),所有受试对象个体间C反应蛋白浓度差异也具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 C反应蛋白检测对于诊断炎症有重要意义。Objective To compare the results of three methods for measuring C reaction protein.Methods 100 patients were collected from our hospital,and three different methods for measuring C reaction protein were used to analyze the level of C reaction protein.Results Correlation analysis showed that the correlation between immunoturbidimetric assay and immunochromatography was higher.The differences of three methods assayed the C reaction protein were significant (P 〉0.05 )among normal people by the variance analysis,but had not statistical significance among abnormal people (P 〈0.05).The differences among all of test people were significant(P 〉0.05).Conclusion Detection of C reaction protein was important for diagnose inflammatory diseases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28