公民参与的争辩与经验研究——十五年来海外相关研究述评  

Controversies over and Empirical Studies of Citizen Participation:A Review of Relevant Research Abroad in the Past 15 Years

作　　者：郭小聪[1] 代凯[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院,广东广州510275

出　　处：《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第3期29-41,共13页Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"公民参与和中国民主行政模式的建构"(12JJD840004);中山大学"985工程"三期建设项目;广东省人民政协理论研究会工作站资助项目阶段性成果

摘　　要：公民参与是公共行政研究者与实践者长期关注的议题之一。公民参与包含参与议题、参与者、参与程序和参与机制等四个关键元素。围绕公民参与"倡导论""怀疑论"与"平衡论"的理论争辩,已有研究在公民参与实践效果、公民参与发生机制与效果机制以及公民参与实践改善等方面积累了大量的经验研究文献。海外公民参与研究呈现出研究理论丰富化、研究方法多样化、研究问题精细化和研究指向实践化等特点和趋势,对推进中国公民参与研究发展与实践改善具有重要的启示意义。Citizen participation （CP） has long since been an important issue for both scholars on and practitioners of public administration. CP includes four key elements, i.e. CP issues, CP participants, CP procedures and CP mechanisms. Centering around the controversies over CP＇s ＂advocacy theory＂, ＂skepticism theory＂ and ＂balance theory＂, scholars have conducted a great number of studies of effects CP practice, mechanisms of CP occurrence, mechanisms of CP effects, and improvement of CP practice. This paper presents a literature review of overseas empirical studies of CP and reveals some characteristics and trends in the research on CP, i. e., constant enhancement of theorization, diversification of research methods, increase in attention to concrete and specific problems, and greater emphasis on practice-oriented research. It is argued that all this has important implications for the study CP and improvement of CP practice in China.

关 键 词：公民参与 决策制定 民主行政 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]