检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛雪[1,2] 高家荣[2] 夏伦祝[2] 方朝晖[2] 汪永忠[2] 李颖[2]
机构地区:[1]安徽中医药大学 [2]安徽中医药大学第一附属医院药学部,安徽合肥230031
出 处:《安徽医药》2014年第3期441-443,共3页Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
基 金:国家科技支撑计划子课题(No 2013BAI06B04Y023032)
摘 要:目的运用药物经济学中的成本—效果分析方法评价格列美脲不同药物联用治疗2型糖尿病短期药物经济学效果,从而指导临床更合理选择和应用药物。方法选取90例病人,运用成本—效果分析方法评价口服降糖药三种给药方案(A组:格列美脲+二甲双胍缓释片;B组:格列美脲+阿卡波糖;C组:格列美脲+吡格列酮)治疗2型糖尿病的药物经济学效果。结果 3种方案的有效率分别为86.7%、90.0%、96.7%。C方案疗效要优于A、B方案,但是B、C组使用的费用比A组明显增高。结论三组的总有效率及不良反应发生率的比较经检验差异无统计学意义。3种治疗方案都能理想的控制血糖,从药物经济学的角度分析,A方案为佳。Objective To evaluate the effect of short - ternl drug econonaics of Glinaepiride combined with different drugs in treatnaent of type 2 diabetes naellitus using the analysis naethods of pharmacoeconomic cost-effectiveness, so as to provide reference for the rational drug use. Methods 90 cases of type -2 DM patients were divided randomly into 3 groups.'fhe cost-effectiveness analysis,three kinds of oral hypoglycenaic drugs ( group A : Glimepiride conabined with naetfornain; group B : Glinaepiride conabined with glucobay ; group C : Glinaepiride conabined with Pioglitazone) were perfornaed and conapared to evaluate the effect of short-term drug economics in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Results The efficiency of 3 Schemes were 86.7% .90.0% .96.7%. The efficacy of C regimen is better than A m^d B,but the B group and C group were significantly higher than the cost of A. Conclusion Compared with the three gro,tp, the total efficient arid incidence of adverse reactions were no significant difference. Control of blood glucose of 3 therapeutic schemes can be ideal, but the scheme of Glimepiride combined with metformin is preferred from the arhslysis of pharmaceuticaleconomics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43