检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:安成日[1,2,3,4] 李金波[5]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江大学政府管理学院政治学行政学系,哈尔滨150080 [2]黑龙江大学国际问题研究所,哈尔滨150080 [3]南开大学历史学 [4]日本国学院大学历史学 [5]黑龙江大学《黑龙江教育(高教版)》,哈尔滨150080
出 处:《日本侵华史研究》2014年第2期41-51,共11页Japanese Invasion of China History Research
基 金:黑龙江省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(批准号:11522087)《佐藤内阁时期日本对外关系研究》;南开大学教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2009年度重大研究项目(批准号:2009JJD770024)《20世纪东亚国际关系的演变》的阶段性成果之一
摘 要:诸多中国古文献和日本、琉球王国的古文献乃至近代西方传教的著作和欧美国家的相关文献都足以证明,钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿自明代以来就已成为我国固有领土。中日产生岛屿纷争纯系日本明治维新以后对外扩张的结果。对属于中国的领土——钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿,不管今天的日本将其视为“私有”抑或定为“国有”,都是无效甚至是可笑的,改变不了钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿自明代以来已是中国固有领土的基本事实。对于部分日本政客妄图借此从程序上强化对钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿的主权控制,摒弃中日两国对钓鱼岛问题达成的共识和默契,则是中方绝不能接受的。In ancient literature and even the writings of many modern western missionary classical Chinese literatures and the Ryukyu Kingdom, Okinawa and related literature United States and Europe are enough to prove that the Diaoyu Islands had become China's inherent territory since the Ming Dynasty. Sino - Japanese islands dispute is purely the result produced after the Meiji Restoration, Japang foreign expansion. On the part of China's territory : the Diaoyu islands, today regardless of Japan being regarded as "private" or as a "state -owned" are ineffective or even ridiculous, can not change the basic fact the Diaoyu Islands and its affiliated islands have been Chi- nag inherent territory since the Ming Dynasty. Some Japanese politicians attempt to take to strengthen the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands and its affiliated islands from the control program, abandon reaching consensus and understanding between China and Japan on the Diaoyu Islands issue, which is absolutely unacceptable to the Chinese side.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222