“民族”与“民生”的互见:以战时美亚公司为例  

The Fusion of “Nationalism”and “Principle of People 's Livelihood”:A Case of MeiYa Company

作　　者：王春英[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学马克思主义学院,上海200240

出　　处：《学术界》2014年第4期183-196,310-311,共14页Academics

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学青年项目"经济统制与政治合作:抗战时期沦陷区商人研究"(10YJC770085);上海市教委科研创新重点项目"国共两党汉奸审判的比较研究(1945-1951)"(14ZS026)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：生存利益论着重从民生的角度阐释商人战时合作行为,对解读商人战时心态十分有力。这一理论框架也可称之为"民族"中的"民生"。然而,它忽视了商人战时如何面对及解决"民族"的困境、战后如何对待二者之间的关系。本文认为战时企业经营者在商业活动中力图在"民族"与"民生"之间进行平衡,这也暗示沦陷区商人的活动,民族与民生密不可分。战后,他们竭力将民生与民族等同,这种将两者合二为一的诡辩既是"事仇民族主义"的体现,又是战前商人的"民族"与"民生"主义观的延续。The benefit theory greatly contributes to the interpretation of the minds of the wartime merchants,with a focus on their collaborations at a human level. In other words,it is a theory that examines'People's Livelihood'from the perspective of'Nationalism'. However,it fails to consider how the merchants got themselves out of the wartime'national'hardships and tried to get along with both of them afterwards. The author argues that the entrepreneurs tried to balance'nationalism'and'livelihood'in the wartime business. It implies that nation and livelihood were bound together in the commercial activities in the occupied area. In the postwar era,they endeavored to equal'Nation'to 'People's Livelihood'. Their strategy reflects both collaborationist nationalism and the continuing understanding of the relationship between 'Nationalism 'and 'Principle of People's Livelihood'of the prewar merchants.Key words:Nationalism;Principle of People's Livelihood;Economic Traitors;M eiYa C ompany

关 键 词：民族主义 民生主义 经济汉奸 美亚公司 

分 类 号：F129[经济管理—世界经济]