检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余先川[1] 熊利平[1] 徐金东[1] 胡丹[1] 张立保[1] 李建广[2]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学信息科学与技术学院,北京100875 [2]中国传媒大学信息工程学院,北京100024
出 处:《国土资源遥感》2014年第2期60-68,共9页Remote Sensing for Land & Resources
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(编号:41272359;41072245);教育部博士点基金(编号:20120003110032)共同资助
摘 要:传统的遥感地质填图方法较少考虑到一个像元中多种地物共生存在的情况,因此所填图件难以反映矿物的分布特征。针对线性混合模型解混精度不高的问题,使用二次散射非线性混合模型对高光谱数据进行光谱解混,并在此基础上,提出了k(k≥2)类地物的填图规则。采用美国内华达州Cuprite地区AVIRIS数据进行填图实验,将其结果与Clark等的填图结果进行对比。实验结果表明:与线性模型的矿物填图相比,基于二次散射非线性混合模型所填图件更加接近矿物的真实分布;使用k(k≥2)类矿物填图规则的填图结果细节丰富,与Clark等人的填图结果吻合度高。Traditional geological mapping methods usually cannot conduct mapping for the whole study area and takes little account to the situation that a variety of features has symbiotic combination in one pixel, which makes it difficult to reflect the complex geological distribution characteristics. Since the unmixing accuracy of the linear model cannot meet actual application need, the secondary scattering model was used to the unmixing of hyperspectral data. On such a basis, this paper proposed k (k ≥2) class mapping rules based on the unmixing result. The Nevada Cuprite AVIRIS data were used in the experiment, and actual mapping results obtained by Clark et al. were taken as the reference. The comparison results have shown that mapping results based on the secondary scattering mixture model are closer to actual ground feature distribution than those based on the linear model and, in comparison with the results from one class mapping rule, the results using k (k≥2) class mapping rules have richer details and are closer to the results obtained by Clark et al.
关 键 词:高光谱 光谱解混 二次散射模型 填图规则 矿物填图
分 类 号:TP79[自动化与计算机技术—检测技术与自动化装置]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.215