基于G1-熵值的智慧旅游城市建设水平评价模型及实证研究  

Evaluation Model and Empirical Study of Wisdom Tourism City Construction Level Based on G1-Entropy

作　　者：王恩旭[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北财经大学旅游与酒店管理学院,辽宁大连116025

出　　处：《大连理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第2期68-73,共6页Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目:"基于企业能力的企业社会责任生态溢出研究"(71303027);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目:"生态型产业集群的形成机理与模式选择"(12YJC630230);辽宁省教育厅人文社会科学研究一般项目:"辽宁省智慧旅游城市建设的影响因素及发展模式研究"(W2012182);辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目:"辽宁沿海经济带区域旅游空间结构形成机制及优化模式研究"(L13DJY067);大连市社科联(社科院)重点课题:"增强大连市创新驱动发展动力研究"(dlskzd201320)

摘　　要：文章以智慧旅游城市建设为研究对象,构建了智慧旅游城市建设水平评价指标体系与评价模型,并以国家旅游局确定的智慧旅游城市建设试点为案例进行实证评价。结果显示,17个城市的智慧旅游城市建设综合水平差距较大,平均水平相对较低。其中,智慧旅游基础设施建设水平、智慧旅游经济发展水平、智慧旅游科技创新水平较低,而智慧旅游硬件支撑水平与智慧旅游环境支撑水平较高。并依据评价结果将17个城市分为6个类别,对每一个类别的智慧旅游城市建设情况进行了分析与对比。In this paper ,taking the wisdom tourism city construction as a study subject ,an evaluation index system and evaluation model of wisdom tourism city construction were developed ,and the construction of a pi-lot smart tourism city of China National Tourism Administration was employed as a case study to make the em-pirical evaluation .The results showed that the overall level of construction in the 17 cities shows a big gap ,and the average level is relatively low ,with the infrastructure level ,economic development level ,and intelligence level of technology innovation being lower ,and with hardware support level and environment support level be-ing higher .Based on the evaluation results the 17 cities were divided into 6 categories ,and the wisdom tourism city construction of each category was analyzed and compared .

关 键 词：智慧旅游城市 评价模型 G1 熵值 

分 类 号：F590[经济管理—旅游管理]