国际货物贸易争议实体问题之法律适用——对CIETAC1996～2006仲裁实例的经验研究  

作　　者：胡诗雪 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院

出　　处：《北京仲裁》2014年第1期23-36,共14页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly

摘　　要：实体问题的法律适用在国际货物贸易争议仲裁中是一个基础性问题。本文通过研究一百余个仲裁案例,发现现实中国际货物贸易争议实体的法律适用在实践中存在极大的不确定性：在存在当事人意思自治情况下,大多数仲裁庭一般会尊重当事人在仲裁前的法律选择,但部分仲裁庭对当事人仲裁开始后的法律选择却不必然遵循;在当事人未选择法律的情况下,我国仲裁庭多依最密切联系原则适用中国法或适用CISG,甚至直接优先根据合同规定和公允原则进行仲裁,极少适用国际惯例,但我国现有仲裁规则缺乏对仲裁庭适用法律规则的顺序、如何进行友好仲裁等问题的具体规定。这种实体问题法律适用的不确定性对当事人而言存在巨大风险。The application of laws of substantial issues isfundamental in international trade arbitration, however, this article points out that such application of rules is quite uncertain, after examine over one hundred CIETAC cases. If the parties have their choices of the applicable rules before the arbitration, most arbitrators would follow the principle of the party autonomy; however, some cases show that if the parties make their choices of the applicable rules after the start of the arbitration, some arbitrators would not insist the principle of the party autonomy. Under other circumstances, where parties did not have their choices of the applicable rules, most Chinese arbitrators would apply PRC rules or CISG, according to the principle of most related rule; some would directly apply contracts and ex aequo et bono principle to the arbitration, while commercial common practice is rarely cited in CIETAC cases. Unfortunately, under these situations, the existing arbitration rules lack the clauses, including the applicable orders between different rules, how to use the ex aequo et bono principle, etc. Such uncertainty in rules application would increase risk to the arbitration parties.

关 键 词：实体问题的法律适用 国际货物贸易仲裁 经验研究 

分 类 号：D996.1[政治法律—经济法学]