检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]曲阜师范大学,273165 [2]北京师范大学
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2001年第2期81-82,共2页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:国家教委师范司重点课题
摘 要:目的 :探讨不同系科师范大学生的社会支持状况及其与人际归因 ,对人性的态度之间的关系。方法 :采用分层抽样法 ,以 1-4年级师范大学生 414名为研究对象 ,用多维度 -多归因因果量表的人际关系分量表、社会支持评定量表和人性的哲学修订量表 ,在各班团体施测。 结果 :1 师范大学生社会支持总分为 40 84± 5 6 6 ,城乡、性别、年级之间无显著差异。 2 理科大学生社会支持总分低于文科、体育 ,差异显著 ,而文科与体育之间无显著差异。 3 社会支持与人际关系“努力”归因有非常显著的正相关 ,与人际归因其它各项相关均不显著。 4 社会支持总分与值得信任因子正相关 ,与愤世嫉俗因子负相关。结论 :此结果适合中国人和其它地方人的共识。Objective: To explore how social support in students of normal college related to their interpersonal attribution and philosophies of human nature, and whether social support varied with different subgroups Method: Social Support Rating Scale, the Multidimentional-Multiattributional Causality Scale and Revised Philosophies of Human Nature Scale were used in 414 students of a normal university Result: The social support of students differed significantly among different departments, students of science had lower social support than students of art or sport had There was no significant difference of social support between sexes, different grades, of urban or rural area Social support was significantly correlated with 'effort' attribution of interpersonal relationship, but not with 'ability, background or luck' Social support was positively related to trustworthiness, while negatively to cynicism Conclusion: This result fits for the common sense of Chinese and people elsewhere
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.204