检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]赤峰市农业技术服务中心,内蒙古赤峰024000 [2]喀喇沁旗农牧业局,内蒙古赤峰024400
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2014年第18期5790-5791,共2页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基 金:国家科技支撑计划(2011BAD16B13;2012BAD04B04;2013BAD07B04)
摘 要:[目的]为了研究玉米最佳施肥方式及肥料种类。[方法]以郑单958为材料,研究了4种不同缓控释型肥料处理下玉米不同时期干重、产量及肥料贡献率的变化。[结果]各处理间玉米净增产量及肥料贡献率均达到0.05水平显著性差异,高低顺序为明泉控释肥>洋丰复合肥>杰翔复合肥>辽中京>CK。缓控释肥料处理的叶面积系数及不同生育时期植株干重占总重的百分比均高于对照。[结论]缓控释肥效果表现最好,其中明泉控释肥表现最突出,其次是洋丰复合肥。[ Objective ] The research aimed to study the best fertilization method and fertilizer types of corn. [ Method ] The changes of corn dry weight, yield and fertilizer contribution rate were studied in different periods of Zheng Dan 958 under four different types of slow/controlled release fertilizers. [ Result] There were significant differences in net increase yield and fertilizer contribution rate between different treatments, and the descending order was Ming Quan release fertilizer 〉 Yang Feng fertilizer 〉 Jie Xiang fertilizer 〉 Liao Zhong Jing fertilizer 〉 CK. The leaf area index and the percentage of plant dry weights in the total weights were higher than those of CK. [ Conclusion] The slow/controlled release fertilizers was better than CK. Ming Quan release fertilizer was best,followed by Yang Feng fertilizer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.28.190