检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河北医科大学学报》2001年第2期78-79,共2页Journal of Hebei Medical University
摘 要:目的比较宁红欣 (国产红细胞生成素 )和利血宝治疗肾性贫血的临床疗效。方法选择肾性贫血 12 0例 ,随机分为宁红欣 (2 0 0 0U ,皮下注射 ,每周 3次 )治疗组 6 0例和利血宝 (30 0 0U ,皮下注射 ,每周 2次 )对照组 6 0例 ,均治疗 12周。结果与治疗前比较 ,宁红欣总有效率 86 .7% ,显效率 5 5 .0 %。利血宝总有效率 85 .0 % ,显效率 5 0 .0 %。两组间上述参数在治疗前、治疗后 4、8、12周均无统计学差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论宁红欣治疗肾性贫血与利血宝疗效基本相当。ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of Ninghongxin(a kind of domestic rhu EPO) and Lixuebao in treatment of renal anemia.Methods120 patients with renal anemia were randomly divided to receive Ninghongxin (n=60) in a dose of 2000U,three times every week for 12 weeks, and Lixuebao (n=60) in a dose of 3000U,twice every week for 12 weeks.ResultsAfter treatment, the total effective rate of Ninghongxin was 86.7 % ,the effective rate was 55 %.The total effective rate of Lixuebao was 85 %, the effective rate was 50 %.There is no significant difference between all parameters of the two groups.ConclusionThe study showed that the efficacy of Ninghongxin in the treatment of renal anemia is as effective as those of Lixuebao in doses stated above.
分 类 号:R556.905[医药卫生—血液循环系统疾病] R973.3[医药卫生—内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145