作为技术的比例:从判例中的比例原则发展看“行政合理性审查”  

The study of “reasonable administrative review” from the development of the “principle of proportionality” in the jurisprudence

作　　者：王俊棋[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学,四川成都610064

出　　处：《四川警察学院学报》2014年第2期30-35,共6页Journal of Sichuan Police College

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目2012年课题<指导性案例的创制技术与适用方法研究>;项目编号:12YJC820096

摘　　要：我国行政立法未明确比例原则,法院在审判实践中发展出比例原则,通过汇丰公司案、王丽萍案、陈宁案,确立并阐释了比例原则在实际司法过程中的不同面向,它既要求实现司法结果的"代价最小化",也要求"利益最大化"。对行政法上的"显失公正"、"滥用职权"等概念的理解提供了新的视角和标准,为法院对行政行为进行"合理性审查"做了理论准备。对法治发展、行政立法和法理学进展都有重要的意义。The lawmakers does not explicitly that “he pri nciple of proportionality” in legislation, the court in the trial practice to develop it. By Huifeng case, the case of Wang Liping, Chen Ning case, court established and explained the different aspects of the principle of proportionality in the actual judicial process. It demands a judicial results “minimal cost”, also called “maximize the benefits ”,which provides a new perspective on the understanding of the concept of “obviously unfair” and “abuse of power” in administrative law, and also make a theoretical foundation for reasonable review”of administrative acts. It has important significance for the development of the rule of law, administrative legislation and jurisprudence progress.

关 键 词：比例原则 判例 功利主义 显失公正 滥用职权 

分 类 号：D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]