检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王婷[1] 玄文博[1] 周利剑[1] 杨辉[1] 赵海峰[2]
机构地区:[1]中国石油管道科技研究中心中国石油天然气集团公司油气储运重点实验室,河北廊坊065000 [2]中国石油天然气管道局国际事业部,河北廊坊065000
出 处:《油气储运》2014年第6期577-581,共5页Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
基 金:中国石油股份公司科研项目"油气管道失效数据库研发";科技专2007-5
摘 要:中国石油对于重大事故的分析与经验分享较为重视,但缺乏对于较轻微事故或事件的分析、发布和共享,不利于发现事故/事件规律,难以保障油气管道等生产设施的本质安全。通过分析国内外油气管道失效数据库的建立与使用情况,阐述了建立、维护油气管道失效数据库的重要性,总结了当前中国石油油气管道失效数据库存在的问题,包括管理标准缺失,缺乏体系约束与政策激励。结合美国、加拿大、欧洲、英国等失效数据库的失效定义、上报流程以及国内管道行业失效信息收集的实际情况,给出了中国石油油气管道失效数据库的进一步推广建议。In PetroChina, great importance is attached to the analysis and experience sharing of serious accidents, but rarely to minor accidents or incidents. In this circumstance, it is not conducive to discover rules of such accidents/incidents and thereby to guarantee the intrinsic safety of oil and gas pipelines and other production facilities. By investigating the oil and gas pipeline failure databases available in China and abroad, this paper justifies the significance of establishing and maintaining the databases, and reveals the issues in PetroChina's oil and gas pipeline failure database, such as absence of management standards and lack of system constraints and policy incentives. Considering the definitions and reporting processes of failure within failure databases in the United States, Canada, Europe and the UK and the practices of failure information collection in pipeline industry in China, this paper also recommends to further promote PetroChina's oil and gas pipeline failure database.
分 类 号:TE88[石油与天然气工程—油气储运工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229