检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜婷[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆师范大学经济与管理学院,重庆401331
出 处:《中国管理科学》2014年第6期10-16,共7页Chinese Journal of Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70972055);重庆师范大学科研基金项目(13XB011)
摘 要:针对新股询价"价高者得"的配给规则,本文提出与之相对应的"价近者得"规则,运用进化博弈理论,对询价对象群体建立单群体模仿者动态模型,分析两种规则下询价对象的报价行为和新股发行价格的形成,并采用2009年6月到2010年10月我国中小企业板市场发行的新股数据,对两种规则下询价对象的进化稳定策略进行数值分析。结果表明,当询价对象预期抑价率均值足够大时,"价高者得"规则下询价对象有高报价的倾向,而"价近者得"规则下询价对象倾向于合理报价,改变我国现行"价高者得"的新股分配规则,采取"价近者得"的规则有助于提高IPO询价效率。At present, the essence of allocation rules in bookbuilding is that the one who offers the highest price obtains the stock. In this work, another principal is proposed that the one who offers the closest price obtains the stock. A one-group replicator dynamic model for the inquiry institution investors is established based on evolutionary game theory, and institutional investors' bidding behavior, IPO price formation in bookhuilding under the present highest price principle and the proposed closed pricing principal are investigated. Additionally, China SME Board IPO data from June 2009 to October 2010 are selected for subsequent numerical analysis of the ESS (Evolutionary stable strategy) under the two principles. It is shown that, when the expected mean of IPO underpricing is large enough, the inquiry institution investors will tend to choose high bidding under the highest pricing principle, and reasonable bidding under the closest principle. Thus proposed principle in this paper is then potentially capable to increase the efficiency of IPO bookbuilding if the current IPO allocation rule is changed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.108.153