维和部队官兵急性应激反应状况调查  

Investigation on acute stress response status of peace-keeping forces

作　　者：李洁[1] 薛理 杨瑞金[3] 吴大方[1] 史丰庆[3] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民解放军第四五一医院内分泌科 [2]63850部队卫生处 [3]解放军第三医院

出　　处：《职业与健康》2014年第12期1601-1603,共3页Occupation and Health

摘　　要：目的调查维和部队官兵急性应激反应状况,比较分析不同兵种维和官兵的急性应激反应。方法采用急性应激反应量表(ASRS)对某维和部队官兵进行调查,所得数据采用SPSS 16.0软件进行描述统计和t检验。结果①维和官兵的5种应激反应中,认知改变最重(0.14),病理改变最轻(0.09)。②维和官兵在难以决定、注意减退和记忆缺失维度上得分较高(高于0.17),绝望、惊恐发作、精神症状得分较低(低于0.10)。③医疗官兵和工程兵在生理反应维度上的得分差异有统计学意义(t=2.099,P=0.039)。2组官兵其余维度的得分及总分都不具有显著差异(均P>0.05)。结论危机干预策略的重点是官兵的认知改变。建议采取相应的调适、干预和训练,确保维和官兵具有良好的心理素质。[Objective]To investigate the acute stress response status of peace-keeping forces,compare the acute stress response of peace-keeping forces in different armies.[Methods]The acute stress response scale（ASRS） was adopted to investigate the soldiers in a peace-keeping force.The obtained data were analyzed with SPSS software to conduct descriptive statistics and t test.[Results]①Among five acute stress responses,the alteration of cognition was the most significant（0.14） and pathology was the least（0.09）.②The scores of difficult to make decision,hypoprosexia and amnesia were higher（higher than 0.17）.The scores of despair,panics and psychotic symptoms were lower（lower than 0.10）.③The difference of physiological response between medical and engineering soldiers was statistically significant（t = 2.099,P = 0.039）.The difference of scores in other dimensions of acute stress response and total score were not significant（P 〉 0.05）.[Conclusion]The key of crisis intervention strategy is the alteration of cognition.Corresponding adjustment,intervention and training program should be adopted to improve the psychological diathesis of peace-keeping forces.

关 键 词：维和部队 急性应激反应 军人 

分 类 号：R13[医药卫生—劳动卫生]