检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]云南财经大学城市与环境学院,昆明650221 [2]云南财经大学商学院,昆明650221 [3]云南财经大学会计学院,昆明650221
出 处:《林业经济问题》2014年第1期43-49,共7页Issues of Forestry Economics
基 金:云南省教育厅科学研究基金资助项目(2012J036)
摘 要:运用演化博弈方法对集体林权流转过程中各利益相关方的博弈关系进行分析的结果表明:林业中间人运作成本、林农的法律意识以及来自政府的监管等因素直接影响林业中间人与林权资产评估机构诚信行为的选择,进而决定集体林权流转市场形态在初级阶段的演化方向。基于此,提出严控林业公职人员市场禁入、优化林权评估委托制度及林区普法工作、构建林权社会化服务平台等政策建议。Analysis of game relationship by applying evolutionary game theory on all interest parties in the process of collective forest right transfer indicate: The evolutionary path of the collective forest right transfer market changes, because that factors, such as operating cost of forestry intermediator, the legal consciousness of forestry farmers and the government's supervision, affect mutual behavioral choices between forestry intermediator and asset evaluation institute. Advices based on the exploration are banning the forestry officials from entering the collective forest right transfer market, optimizing forest right evaluation system and the legal work in forest district, constructing socialized service'platforms of forest rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222