文义解释在法律解释方法中的优位性及其限度  

The Priority of Literal Interpretation among Legal Interpretative Methods and Its Limitation

作　　者：魏治勋[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《求是学刊》2014年第4期95-102,共8页Seeking Truth

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目"法律解释的原理与方法体系";项目编号:12FFX016;山东大学自主创新基金项目(青年团队项目)"走向大国的中国法治:从法律体系到法治体系";项目编号:IFYT1220

摘　　要：文义解释是获得绝大多数法律人认同的最具基础性的法律解释方法,但当前有关文义解释含义和范围界定的分歧正在瓦解文义解释优位性的共识。文义解释要确证其在法律解释方法序列中的优位性,其自身就必须获得确定的内涵;其优位性的合法性根基则在于法治国体制架构;而对其合理界限的规则限制,则为其实践操作确立了规范性根据。文义解释正是基于其功能优势、积极后果和合理限度而对法治国持存具有构成性意义。Literal interpretation, which has met universal approbation of lawyers, is the most fundamental legal interpretative method. By now the general consensus about the proposition that literal interpretation takes top priority in the sequences of legal interpretative methods is about to be reconstructed with the divergence in the understanding of meaning and scope of literal interpretation in academic circles. Literal interpretation must be given complete connotation if its superiority in the sequence of legal interpretative methods would be preserved, its legitimate basis lies in the architecture of law state, and the normative foundation of its practical application can be well established in virtue of defining its meaning limitation reasonably by the rule. It is just the advantages of prominent function and positive consequences that make literal interpretation constitutionally significant for the sustainability of law state.

关 键 词：文义解释 优位性 黄金规则 法治国 

分 类 号：D90-055[政治法律—法学理论]