不同肠道准备法用于电子结肠镜检查准备效果观察  

作　　者：邬红霞 高淑容 王开琼 黄凤梅 

机构地区：[1]重庆市垫江县人民医院内镜室,重庆垫江408300

出　　处：《实用中医药杂志》2014年第7期629-630,共2页Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的:观察不同方法用于电子结肠镜肠道准备的效果。方法:180例随机分为A、B、C组各60例;A组口服聚乙二醇电解质散,B组口服甘露醇,C组口服聚乙二醇电解质散、番泻叶,观察并详细记录各组肠道准备效果,肠道气泡率,不良反应发生情况。结果:肠道清洁程度有效率C组93.33%、A组73.33%、B组53.33%,3组间比较有统计学差异(P<0.05,P<0.01);去气泡满意率C组95.00%,A组81.67%、B组60.00%,3组间比较具有统计学差异(P<0.05,P<0.01);C组不良反应明显少于A组、B组,3组间比较具有统计学差异(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论:采用番泻叶联合聚乙二醇电解质散能在电子结肠镜检查中有良好的肠道准备效果,气泡率发生较少,不良反应少,可提高电子结肠镜检查的成功率。Objective：to study different methods of bowel preparation in the curative effect of the electronic colonoscopy in order to improve the success rate of electronic colonoscopy.Methods：in July 2012 - October 2013 to line 180 cases of patients checked with electronic colonoscopy in DianJiangXian people’s hospital,randomLy divided into A,B,C three groups,each group of 60 patients;Intestinal preparation： group A oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder;group B orally mannitol;Group C oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder,senna;To observe the effect and detailed records for intestinal preparation group,intestinal bubbles rate,adverse reactions occurred.Results：in group C degree of intestinal cleaning effectiveness is 93.33%,higher than that of group A 73.33%and group B 53.33% ,statistically different;In group C the satisfaction rate of getting rid of bubbles is 95.00%,higher than that of group A’s 81.67% and group B’s 60.00%,statistically different;Adverse reactions of group C was obviously less than group A and group B,with statistical differences.Conclusion：senna with polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder used in electronic colonoscopy may gain good effect for intestinal preparation,bubble rate occurred less,and less adverse reaction,and improve the success rate of the electronic colonoscopy ,which can be promoted in clinical application.

关 键 词：肠道准备方法 电子结肠镜检查 疗效分析 

分 类 号：R445.9[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]