建筑设计方案的层次分析法评判——以学生作业为例  

Architectural Design Scheme Evaluation Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Taking the Student Works as an Example

作　　者：易中[1] 李蕾[1] 罗奇[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京交通大学建筑与艺术学院

出　　处：《华中建筑》2014年第7期167-170,共4页Huazhong Architecture

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费资金资助成果(编号:A11JB0070)

摘　　要：层次分析法是系统工程中对非定量事件进行定量研究的理论,也是对人的主观判断做出客观描述的有效手段;在工作实践中,经常遇到要求某些事件依据约定的评价指标排序、从中选优,而层次分析法就是处理这类问题的一种方法;层次分析法从问世以来,在各个领域得到了极其广泛的应用。就建筑学而言,建筑设计方案的评价是一个必须的、复杂的过程,应当综合考虑许多因素,如建筑总体布局、经济与技术指标、图纸规范性、环境协调关系等等。因为如何选择评价方法是建筑师、建筑教育工作者始终关注、探索的重要课题,所以无论是建筑设计教学、建筑设计竞赛还是建筑设计方案的招标、评标,都需要相对客观的、建立在科学基础上的评价方法,尽量减少人为因素的影响。该文以学生作业为例,尝试探讨层次分析法在建筑设计方案评判中的应用。AHP is not only a quantitative research theory regarding non-quantitative event in systems engineering, but also an effective means to make an objective description on people＇s subjective judgment. In practice, we often encounter the question that requires to sort and select the best according to the agreed evaluation, while the AHP is a way to deal with such issues; After its inception, analytic hierarchy process has been widely applied in various fields. On the architecture, the evaluation of architectural design is a must, complex process; many factors should be taken into account, such as the overall layout of the building, economic and technical factors, drawing correctness, environmental harmony. How to choose the evaluation method that is the important issue for architect, architectural educators to explore. So architectural education, architecture competition and architectural bidding require relatively objective evaluation methods based on science in order to minimize the influence of human being. In this paper, taking the student＇s work for example, the author attempts to apply the Analytic Hierarchy Process in architectural design evaluation.

关 键 词：建筑设计方案 层次分析法 多目标决策 

分 类 号：TU-05[建筑科学—建筑理论]