行政复议的理念调整与制度完善——事关我国《行政复议法》及相关法律的重要修改  

Idea Adjustment and System Improvement of Administrative Reconsideration

作　　者：杨海坤[1,2] 朱恒顺[1,3] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院 [2]中国行政法学会 [3]全国人大内务司法委员会内务室

出　　处：《法学评论》2014年第4期18-32,共15页Law Review

摘　　要：针对目前学界和实际部门比较流行的行政复议制度完善必须遵循进一步"司法化"途径的主张,本文从调查所得的实际情况出发,认为当下完善行政复议制度的根本途径在于强调其行政性和效率性,并在此前提下补充或增强其"司法性";提高行政复议制度的公信力,关键还在于使行政复议机关承担起应有的严格的行政法律责任。为此,应该夯实行政复议制度的理论基础,调整、更新其理念,并建立行政机关即时自我审查制度、普遍设置行政复议前置程序制度、原则上废除行政复议决定为最终裁决制度以及确立由复议机关在作出复议决定后一律担当行政诉讼被告等制度。On the proposal popular with some scholars and practitioners that the administrative review should adhere to judicialization, the author of this article, after actual survey, insists on that the fundamental way of improving administrative review lies in enhancing its administrative nature and efficiency, and enhancing its judicialization should be on the basis of its administrative nature and efficiency. The key factor of improving the credibility of the administrative review is to impose administrative liability on the review body. For this reason, the theoretical basis should be strengthened, and the conception be adjusted and renewed. We should also establish the instant self-review system of administrative body, set up the prepositional procedure system of administrative review, deny the final effect of administrative review. At last, what the author emphasizes is that all of the review body must be the defendant in the administrative action.

关 键 词：行政复议 理念调整 制度完善 法律修改 

分 类 号：D922.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]